On Wed, 29 Jul 2009, Mykola Dzham wrote: Hi, > Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: >> On Sat, 25 Jul 2009, Mykola Dzham wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >>> After r188146 creating tcp ipv6 socket in jail without ipv6 ip is not >>> allowed, but udp socket is allowed. >> >> I cannot really follow what you are trying to say as wrt IPv4 and IPv6 >> sockets and what about UDP. >> >> Your sample further down is trying to use an IPv4 address on an IPv6 >> Datagram socket which is an error either way. > > Some java programms attempt to use ipv6 sockets, then use ipv4 if > socket(AF_INET6,...) fail. My sample imitate this > >> Prior to FreeBSD 7.2 IPv6 hadn't been supported at all for jails. >> >> With 7.2 it was possible to create IPv6 sockets (but only shortly and >> then fail on bind/connect/...). With the commit you reference the >> "Protocol not supported" came back in case there was no address of >> that address family for a given jail. >> >> With 8 the primary syntax for jails has changed and the "backward >> compat mode" again allows you to create a socket on a jail even if >> no address of the same family was configured for the jail. >> >> This should be addressed by the following patch: >> http://people.freebsd.org/~bz/20090727-01-jail8-legacy.diff >> >> Can you give it a try and report if that fixes your problem? > > Patch aplied cleanly on r195820 , but jail can not start after patching: > > # jail -l -U root -i /usr/home/d/guests/tap2 tap2.my.domain.com 10.112.0.151 /bin/sh /etc/rc > jail: ip6: unknown boolean value "disable" r195820 is too old; but Jamie has a better solution; I would suggest to backout the jail(8) patch and wait for the next two commits of Jamie to HEAD and then update the machine again. /bz -- Bjoern A. Zeeb The greatest risk is not taking one.Received on Wed Jul 29 2009 - 10:20:09 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:52 UTC