On Jul 29, 2009, at 15:46, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 29/07/2009 16:24 Thomas Backman said the following: >> Hmm, you are indeed right, it's not the same panic. The backtrace I >> got >> just now with INVARIANTS is the one you quoted above. >> I still get the "_sx_xlock (sx=Variable "sx" is not available.)" and >> "_sx_xlock_hard (sx=0xffffff00090d5018, ..., opts=Variable "opts" >> is not >> available.)" though. >> Am I missing some option (I've got GENERIC, minus WITNESS plus >> DTRACE, >> now that INVARIANTS is back in place), or does this "just happen"? > > Not sure what this question is about. What option, what "this" :-) > >> Here's the "full" backtrace (minus the panic(), trap() etc.): >> >> #10 0xffffffff8057dfe7 in calltrap () >> at /usr/src/sys/amd64/amd64/exception.S:224 >> #11 0xffffffff80342b99 in _sx_xlock_hard (sx=0xffffff00090d5018, >> tid=18446742974952890368, opts=Variable "opts" is not available. >> ) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_sx.c:575 >> #12 0xffffffff8034350e in _sx_xlock (sx=Variable "sx" is not >> available. >> ) at sx.h:155 >> #13 0xffffffff80af7596 in zfs_freebsd_reclaim () from /boot/kernel/ >> zfs.ko >> #14 0xffffffff805c5c2a in VOP_RECLAIM_APV (vop=0xffffff00090d5018, >> a=0xffffff00090d5000) at vnode_if.c:1926 >> #15 0xffffffff803c839e in vgonel (vp=0xffffff0009252588) at >> vnode_if.h:830 >> #16 0xffffffff803cc958 in vflush (mp=0xffffff0002cd7bc0, rootrefs=0, >> flags=0, >> td=0xffffff002cffe000) at /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_subr.c:2449 >> #17 0xffffffff80af2038 in zfs_umount () from /boot/kernel/zfs.ko >> #18 0xffffffff803c55ca in dounmount (mp=0xffffff0002cd7bc0, >> flags=47020992, >> td=Variable "td" is not available. >> ) at /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_mount.c:1289 >> #19 0xffffffff803c5df8 in unmount (td=0xffffff002cffe000, >> uap=0xffffff803e98bbf0) at /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_mount.c:1174 >> #20 0xffffffff805980bf in syscall (frame=0xffffff803e98bc80) >> at /usr/src/sys/amd64/amd64/trap.c:984 >> #21 0xffffffff8057e2c1 in Xfast_syscall () >> at /usr/src/sys/amd64/amd64/exception.S:373 >> #22 0x000000080104e9ec in ?? () >> Previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?) > > Looks like your zfs module is built without debugging symbols? > Maybe because was it built/rebuilt individually, not as part of > kernel build? > > It would be useful to get line number in frame 13 and examine sx > object in frame > 11, esp. sx_lock field. > > -- > Andriy Gapon The "this" (above) was referring to variable values not being available in a vmcore. :) The zfs module appears to be built with symbols, and the symbols appear to be loaded in kgdb: Reading symbols from /boot/kernel/zfs.ko...Reading symbols from / bootdir/boot/kernel/zfs.ko.symbols...done. done. Loaded symbols for /boot/kernel/zfs.ko Reading symbols from /boot/kernel/opensolaris.ko...Reading symbols from /bootdir/boot/kernel/opensolaris.ko.symbols...done. done. Loaded symbols for /boot/kernel/opensolaris.ko I didn't build the module(s) individually, either; in the previous cases, it was a clean buildworld/buildkernel (even with rm -rf /usr/ obj/* beforehand), and in this case "just" a buildkernel (no manual cleaning, but no -DNO_CLEAN either). Regards, ThomasReceived on Wed Jul 29 2009 - 11:52:44 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:52 UTC