Re: cpufreq on VIA C7

From: Uwe Grohnwaldt <uwe_at_grohnwaldt.eu>
Date: Sat, 01 Aug 2009 01:49:03 +0200
Hi,

disabling cpufreq in the kernel configfile works fine. after that it 
looks fine:
dev.cpu.0.freq_levels: 2000/20000 1000/10000 800/8000 400/4000

thanks for help,
Uwe Grohnwaldt
Max-Planck-Str. 2A, 1.03.2
18059 Rostock
--------------------------
Fon:   +49 (0)381 1224811
Mobil: +49 (0)172 3209285
--------------------------
eMail: uwe_at_grohnwaldt.eu
www:   http://lando.cc
ICQ:   149348486
Skype: lando_calr
--------------------------


Uwe Grohnwaldt schrieb:
> Hi,
> 
> compiling the Kernel without HWPMC_HOOKS works well - this problem is 
> solved. :)
> The problem with cpu frequency remains unsolved - any ideas?
> 
> Thanks,
> Uwe Grohnwaldt
  > oschonef_at_techfak.uni-bielefeld.de schrieb:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Eines schoenen Tages schrieb Uwe Grohnwaldt:
>>> I have a Jetway J7F5M2H-VDE Mainboard with a VIA C7 2GHz CPU. I 
>>> installed FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE and updated it to FreeBSD 8.0 Beta2.
>> [..]
>>> Another problem is, that I have some messages like this in dmesg:
>>> NMI ISA 3c, EISA 0
>>> NMI ISA 2c, EISA 0
>>
>>
>> You could try to compile a kernel without the HWPMC_HOOKS option.
>> (see http://www.nabble.com/NMI-ISA-2c,-EISA-ff-td23033469.html)
>>
>> I had similar issues with a Jetway J7F2$something board. The kernel 
>> always
>> dropped into DDB after receiving a NMI. I was not able to install CURRENT
>> (respectively 8.0 BETA2) on this system. However, the kernel without the
>> HWPMC_HOOKS options boots successfully.
>> Currently, I am trying to do a source update from STABLE to CURRENT.
>> STABLE does not show this behaviour and just works fine.
>>
>> HTH,
>> Oliver
Received on Fri Jul 31 2009 - 21:49:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:53 UTC