Re: [head tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64

Eygene Ryabinkin schrieb:
> This is very weird (judging by the GCC's manual) since the simplest C
> program,
> -----
> int main(void)
> {
> 	return 0;
> }
> 
> void foo(void) __attribute__ ((unused))
> {
> 	return;
> }
> -----
> but ICC 10.x produces the same error and happily chewes __attribute__
> on the function prototype.  Anyway, I see no warnings even without
> '((unused)) attribute with -Wall, so '__attribute__ ((unused))' looks
> like no-op nowadays.

There is no warning about foo() being unused, because it is not static.

	Christoph