On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 09:20:33PM +0400, Dmitry Marakasov wrote: > * Wesley Shields (wxs_at_FreeBSD.org) wrote: > > Well, cred->cr_prison was the only thing to panic on in prison_priv_check, > so that was obvious without the backtrace. I'll try to addd checking > for null pointer here for now (as I'm more concerned in bringing > my NAS back up). Adding a check for null to jailed() in kern_jail.c will most likely work around the problem, but I was under the impression that cred->cr_prison should be &prison0 and never null with the new way of doing things. I'd still like to know why cr_prison is null. Of course, I have no idea what the implications of a null check in jailed() will be outside of this one scenario. -- WXSReceived on Wed Jun 03 2009 - 15:40:24 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:49 UTC