Re: [head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sun4v

On Wednesday 03 June 2009 11:26:17 pm Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
> > > By the way, having looked at sys/sys/pcpu.h, I see that there are parts
> > > of 'struct pcpu' that depend on the KTR_PERCPU being defined and they
> > > are never compensated with padding in PCPU_MD_FIELDS for sun4v.  Is
> > > KTR_PERCPU constant for sun4v (inexisting or defined everytime) or I am
> > > missing something?
> > 
> > It's just not taken into account but AFAICT also dead code.
> 
> Yes, seems like so.  John, may be we can eliminate the only reference to
> KTR_PERCPU from sys/sys/pcpu.h?  Both 'struct pcpu' fields seem to be
> unused (grep'ped -CURRENT sources).

Yes.

-- 
John Baldwin