On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 02:35:56PM +0200, Erik Cederstrand wrote: > Den 04/06/2009 kl. 11.38 skrev Ed Schouten: > > >You can now build your very own version of FreeBSD with Clang > >installed > >as /usr/bin/cc as follows: > > Thanks for your hard work, Ed. This is great news! > > You might want to mention that a few parts are still GCC-compiled due > to bugs in Clang ( see http://wiki.freebsd.org/ > BuildingFreeBSDWithClang). Also, it's very encouraging that the ports > run you did with Erwin > (http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-dev/2009-June/005274.html ) > compiles over 7000 ports with Clang. > > I've asked in the Clang list, but I'd like an opinion from FreeBSD > folks, too: Clang supports LTO > (http://llvm.org/docs/LinkTimeOptimization.html ), which has a potential > for performance improvements. It doesn't work on FreeBSD because the > linker we have (in binutils) doesn't know about the libLTO that LLVM > provides. There's a new linker from GNU called Gold, but as far as I know > it's GPLv3 licensed and therefore undesirable at least to have in base. > LLVM provides a linker (http://llvm.org/cmds/llvm-ld.html ) but "it doesn't > interact correctly with conventional nm/ar/etc" > (http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-dev/2009-June/005296.html ). > There's the ELF toolchain project (elftoolchain.sourceforge.net/) but a > BSD-licensed ld hasn't been developed yet. > > What would be the best way to get LTO to work on FreeBSD? you could use llvm-ld (see the wiki for instructions how to do it). there's also some effort to make gnu ld usable with llvm LTO and I guess the patch could be backported to our ld. I guessReceived on Thu Jun 04 2009 - 10:39:04 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:49 UTC