Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > This is kind of a heads up that from the time 8 will be branched off > and HEAD will be 9 all new code should > 1) have feature parity for INET and INET6 where applicable As a sort of side-note, what about feature parity for INET6 for existing IPV4 features like TSO? Who is working on that? Thanks, DrewReceived on Thu Jun 11 2009 - 19:48:58 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:49 UTC