Hi, I am using the NetBSD implementation of rtld(src/libexec/ld.elf_so/) for ARM/MIPS. I have C++ static constructor/destructor issue with my rtld. Problem Report: "ld.elf_so does not execute .init/.fini functions in order" and [libc] dlclose gives "invalid shared object handle" when called through the fini function of another module. The similar NetBSD/freeBSD issues are found from the following References: [1] http://gnats.netbsd.org/37347 [2] http://updraft3.jp.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/42956 The above issues are already commited in NetBSD-5-0-RELEASE. I have ported NetBSD-5-0-RELEASE rtld and tested Ref[1] provided static constructor/destructor test and did not find any issues with shared pthread combination but noticed [libc] dlclose gives "invalid shared object handle" without pthread combination. The static constructor/destructor test results: It should be : -------------- $ ./foobar foo_ctor bar_ctor tar_ctor main_ctor dep1_ctor dep2_ctor dll_ctor dll_dtor dep2_dtor dep1_dtor main_dtor tar_dtor bar_dtor foo_dtor While currently I get: ---------------------- with pthreads: $ ./foobar foo_ctor bar_ctor tar_ctor main_ctor dep1_ctor dep2_ctor dll_ctor dll_dtor dep2_dtor dep1_dtor main_dtor tar_dtor bar_dtor foo_dtor without pthreads: $ ./foobar foo_ctor bar_ctor tar_ctor main_ctor dep1_ctor dep2_ctor dll_ctor dll_dtor dep2_dtor dep1_dtor main_dtor tar_dtor bar_dtor foo_dtor Invalid shared object handle 0xbdbed400 This gives a "invalid shared object handle" message because the refcount field (obj->dl_refcount) for the handle is zero. I have little bit confused about dlclose destructor with/without pthreads. I have some queries: 1) Is it required any changes apart from the NetBSD-5-0-RELEASE/{Ref[1],[2]}? 2) Are any changes required in thread-stub? Could anyone provide any inputs to the my issue? Thanks in advance. Thanks & Regards, VenkappaReceived on Tue Jun 16 2009 - 08:01:46 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:50 UTC