on 18/06/2009 16:09 John Baldwin said the following: > On Wednesday 17 June 2009 2:29:25 pm Alexander Best wrote: >> hi there, >> >> although i'm running a very recent current which has "ACPICA 20090521", estX >> still isn't attaching properly on my machine: >> >> est0: <Enhanced SpeedStep Frequency Control> on cpu0 >> est: CPU supports Enhanced Speedstep, but is not recognized. >> est: cpu_vendor GenuineIntel, msr 925092506000925 >> device_attach: est0 attach returned 6 >> est1: <Enhanced SpeedStep Frequency Control> on cpu1 >> est: CPU supports Enhanced Speedstep, but is not recognized. >> est: cpu_vendor GenuineIntel, msr 925092506000925 >> device_attach: est1 attach returned 6 > > That just means ACPI isn't providing info about the speed steppings your CPU > provides. It is odd that cpu0 has freq_levels but cpu1 does not. > This is most probably not related to the issue at hand. But I have some (probably unfounded) suspicions about OS features that we advertise via _PDC. Also, I find the following interesting in acpi_cpu.c. First we call _PDC, then we call _OSC and then there is the following comment between the two calls: /* * On some systems we need to evaluate _OSC so that the ASL * loads the _PSS and/or _PDC methods at runtime. ... -- Andriy GaponReceived on Fri Jun 19 2009 - 09:10:06 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:50 UTC