Jeff Roberson <jroberson_at_jroberson.net> wrote: > http://people.freebsd.org/~jeff/mbuf2.diff > This is a call for testers and feedback on my mbuf layout improvements. > I'm trying to decide whether I will push to have these included in 8.0. > After reducing the scope slightly from my last patch, I have not > encountered any problems. Kip Macy has also been using it for the past > few weeks without issue. > > You should not expect any functional changes from this patch. The goal > is mostly to pave the way fors more sensible mbuf handling in the > future, although it does offer a few performance benefits. So far I haven't been able to reproduce the em-related panic I reported with an earlier version of the patch. I'm not sure if it was reproducible back then, though. FabianReceived on Sat Jun 20 2009 - 08:52:53 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:50 UTC