Kamigishi Rei wrote: > Hello, hope you're having a nice day, > > Ulrich Spörlein wrote: >> I, personally, think this is not very good idea. People are used to >> CAM-devices getting enumerated as da0, da1, etc. All the documentation >> talks about ad0 for ATA and da0 (plus camcontrol) for SCSI, USB, >> Firewire devices. We also have fd0 and cd0 and should stick to >> two-letter-plus-number codes. So either make them all ad0 or da0. I'd >> vote for the latter, as that is what Linux is doing (more or less) and >> people are already familiar with USB drives or new SATA drives showing >> up as "SCSI drives, so they get the SCSI names". >> > This poses the question of daXX enumeration order. I've already had some > 'fun' with an IBM server which has an LVD/320 SCSI controller. While the > controller's bus was enumerated properly, somehow if you attach an USB > mass storage device before the system boot that said mass storage could > suddenly appear earlier than one of the SCSI disks (that was on > 7.0-RELEASE) thus breaking the boot process sometimes (when it appeared > as da0). > CAM allows you to statically set the enumeration order via hints in either the kernel config file or in /boot/loader.conf. /sys/conf/NOTES contains information and examples of this. ScottReceived on Sat Jun 27 2009 - 12:42:59 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:50 UTC