2009/6/28 Marcel Moolenaar <xcllnt_at_mac.com>: > Using the last sector is not only flawed because it creates a race > condition, it's flawed in the assumption that you can always make > a geom part of a mirror by storing meta-data on the geom without > causing corruption. This whole idea of using the last sector was > so that a fully partitioned disk with data could be turned into a > mirrored disk. A neat idea, but hardly the basis for a generic > mirroring implementation when it silently corrupts a disk. > > I think it's better to change gmirror to use the first sector on the > provider. Yes, it would be cleaner to implement but it would also make the mirrored devices unbootable. But maybe the class of users needing the functionality is smaller now. > This never creates a race condition and as such, you don't > need to invent a priority scheme, that has it's own set of flaws on > top of it. The only downside is that it's not easy to make a fully > partitioned and populated disk part of a mirror: one would need to > move the data forward one sector to free the first sector. This we > can actually do by inserting a GEOM that does it while I/O is still > ongoing. The good thing is: we need a class that does exactly this > for implementing the "move" verb in gpart. Looks too complicated and fragile. Maybe there's a need for metadata-less automatic mirrors in some way, by storing the configuration somewhere else, possibly in /etc.Received on Sun Jun 28 2009 - 11:18:37 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:50 UTC