Anonymous wrote: > Hans Ottevanger <hansot_at_iae.nl> writes: > >> Norikatsu Shigemura wrote: >>> Hi. >>> >> Hi, >> >> I have almost the same issue, just the addresses are different and in >> my case the trap occurs on cpu2. >> >> My system is based on an Intel PB965LT main board with a Q6600 quad >> core CPU and 8 Gbyte of RAM. I am also using the amd64 kernel, where >> kernel configuration is almost identical to GENERIC, with devices >> removed that I do not have and the following lines added >> >> device drm >> device radeondrm >> device sound >> device snd_hda >> >> If I remove the drm and radeondrm devices from the config file and >> recompile the kernel, the panic does not occur and the corresponding >> modules can be loaded without a problem. > > Can you try to boot with DRM and hw.drm.msi=0? In my case it does not > panic then. > Hi, I have just tried this with r195137 and the drm devices described above in my kernel configuration file. If I specify "set hw.drm.msi=0" from the loader prompt -no- panic occurs, otherwise it does. So it appears that this workaround works. Kind regards, Hans >> Some "binary searching" of Subversion releases shows that the problem >> first occurs with r194985. If I update to r195137 and revert the >> relevant files from the revision r194985 to r194984, no panic occurs. >> >> Of course it could very well be that r194985 itself is not the issue, >> but triggers a problem somewhere else in the kernel. >> >> Kind regards, >> >> Hans >> >>> I got a panic after AP CPU launched on boot. So I couldn't get >>> crash dump and information. >>> >>> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - >>> FreeBSD nadesico.ninth-nine.com 8.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT #49: Sun Jun 28 02:53:48 JST 2009 nork_at_nadesico.ninth-nine.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/NADESICO amd64 >>> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - >>> >>> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - >>> SMP: AP CPU #3 Launched! >>> SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! >>> SMP: AP CPU #2 Launched! >>> >>> Fatal trap 30: reserved (unknown) fault while in kernel mode >>> cpuid = 3; apic id = 03 >>> instruction pointer = 0x20:0xffffffff804bce56 >>> stack pointer = 0x20:0xffffff8000039b60 >>> frame pointer = 0x20:0xffffff8000039b70 >>> code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b >>> = DPL 0, pres 1, long 1, def32 0, gran 1 >>> processor eflags = interrupt enabled, IOPL = 0 >>> current process = 11 (idle: cpu3) >>> [thread pid 11 tid 100003 ] >>> Stopped at acpi_cpu_c1+0x6: leave >>> db> bt >>> Tracing pid 11 tid 100003 td 0xffffff8001863720 >>> acpi_cpu_c1() at acpi_cpu_c1+0x6 >>> acpi_cpu_idle() at acpi_cpu_idle+0x20c >>> sched_idletd() at sched_idletd+0x123 >>> fork_exit() at fork_exit+0x117 >>> fork_trampoline() at fork_trampoline+0xe >>> --- trap 0, rip = 0, rsp = 0xffffff8000039d40, rbp = 0 --- >>> db> >>> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - >>> >>> I can boot with kern.smp.diabled=1, so I get address lines. >>> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - >>> (kgdb) list *acpi_cpu_c1+0x6 >>> 0xffffffff804bce56 is in acpi_cpu_c1 (/usr/src/sys/amd64/acpica/acpi_machdep.c:100). >>> 95 >>> 96 void >>> 97 acpi_cpu_c1() >>> 98 { >>> 99 __asm __volatile("sti; hlt"); >>> 100 } >>> (kgdb) list *acpi_cpu_idle+0x20c >>> 0xffffffff801b443c is in acpi_cpu_idle (/usr/src/sys/dev/acpica/acpi_cpu.c:966). >>> 961 ACPI_ENABLE_IRQS(); >>> 962 >>> 963 /* Find the actual time asleep in microseconds. */ >>> 964 end_time = acpi_TimerDelta(end_time, start_time); >>> 965 sc->cpu_prev_sleep = (sc->cpu_prev_sleep * 3 + PM_USEC(end_time)) / 4; >>> 966 } >>> (kgdb) list *sched_idletd+0x123 >>> 0xffffffff8030b733 is in sched_idletd (/usr/src/sys/kern/sched_ule.c:2562). >>> 2557 cpu_spinwait(); >>> 2558 } >>> 2559 } >>> 2560 switchcnt = tdq->tdq_switchcnt + tdq->tdq_oldswitchcnt; >>> 2561 if (tdq->tdq_load == 0) >>> 2562 cpu_idle(switchcnt > 1); >>> 2563 if (tdq->tdq_load) { >>> 2564 thread_lock(td); >>> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - >Received on Sun Jun 28 2009 - 17:29:49 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:50 UTC