On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 11:11:16PM +0200, Aragon Gouveia wrote: > Scott Long wrote: > >Aragon Gouveia wrote: > >>But with limited space we probably should just decide to not worry > >>about anything older than Windows XP... > > > >How about not worrying about NetBSD or OpenBSD? How many people > >typically multi-boot OpenBSD? I was about to suggest that -- in terms of popularity, the various FAT alternatives versions are by far more common. > Another benefit of dropping MS OSes older than Windows XP is removing > all references to "DOS" when displaying the boot menu. this is already gone. There is a DOS string but almost always it maps to Windows due to space constraints. cheers luigiReceived on Sun Jun 28 2009 - 19:51:10 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:50 UTC