On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 9:03 PM, Brooks Davis <brooks_at_freebsd.org> wrote: > > I don't have much time to debug this, but I've not had problems with > services starting too early on the systems I've been running with async > dhcp. If there is a problem with the wait process we need to actually > debug it. If the wait for a route/running interface isn't sufficent we > should try to figure out what is. Synchronous dhcp sucks and yeilds > justifed user complaints so it would be nice to kill it off. I switched > the default because it worked for me and I hoped that people would help > find and fix edge cases. Can you elaborate why synchronous DHCP sucks ? > > BTW, the change to background by default still doesn't make sense to > me. At best it shouldn't do anything useful in the async case and it > entierly defeats the sync case. > Yeah, I realized this as soon as people started complaining about the changes and reverting that commit didn't fix their problem. I'll back it out. Cheers, Mike.Received on Wed Mar 04 2009 - 05:12:51 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:43 UTC