On 3/9/09, Kostik Belousov <kostikbel_at_gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 04:42:25PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: >> On Monday 09 March 2009 9:15:22 am Paul B. Mahol wrote: >> > Hi, >> > here is part of textdump: >> > >> > panic(c061db9e,0,c061cee6,88e,4,...) at panic+0x136 >> > vrele(c4326d9c,0,c433fb5f,82,c060f3c7,...) at vrele+0x111 >> > null_nodeget(c3fd4780,c4326d9c,c3ba8bf4,0,c3ba8be4,...) at >> > null_nodeget+0xa0 >> > null_bypass(c3ba8be0,c3f35a78,c3ba8c28) at null_bypass+0x141 >> > VOP_VPTOCNP_APV(c4340240,c3ba8be0,c061bf01,387,c3cecc00,...) at >> > VOP_VPTOCNP_APV+0xb3 >> >> Try this. null_bypass() can't handle VOP_VPTOCNP because VPTOCNP doesn't >> return a vnode that is locked and VREF'd, but just a vnode that is >> vhold()'d. >> This patch attempts to give nullfs a VOP_VPTONCP() method which remaps the >> >> directory vnode properly on return by locking the directory vnode while >> invoking null_nodeget(). >> >> --- //depot/user/jhb/lock/fs/nullfs/null_vnops.c >> +++ /home/jhb/work/p4/lock/fs/nullfs/null_vnops.c >> _at__at_ -722,6 +722,34 _at__at_ >> return VOP_VPTOFH(lvp, ap->a_fhp); >> } >> >> +static int >> +null_vptocnp(struct vop_vptocnp_args *ap) >> +{ >> + struct vnode *lvp, *dvp; >> + int error; >> + >> + /* >> + * We can't use null_bypass() because 'dvp' is not returned >> + * locked. It is merely 'vhold()'ed. >> + */ >> + lvp = NULLVPTOLOWERVP(ap->a_vp); >> + error = VOP_VPTOCNP(lvp, &dvp, ap->a_buf, ap->a_buflen); >> + if (error) >> + return (error); >> + >> + /* >> + * Map 'dvp' to the corresponding null node. We have to lock >> + * it before calling null_nodeget(). >> + */ >> + vn_lock(dvp, LK_SHARED | LK_RETRY); >> + error = null_nodeget(ap->a_vp->v_mount, dvp, ap->a_vpp); >> + if (error) { >> + vrele(dvp); >> + vdrop(dvp); >> + } >> + return (error); >> +} >> + >> /* >> * Global vfs data structures >> */ >> _at__at_ -743,4 +771,5 _at__at_ >> .vop_strategy = VOP_EOPNOTSUPP, >> .vop_unlock = null_unlock, >> .vop_vptofh = null_vptofh, >> + .vop_vptocnp = null_vptocnp, >> }; > > I do not think that nullfs-specific method is needed. > I already mailed the following patch to the reporters. > > diff --git a/sys/fs/nullfs/null_vnops.c b/sys/fs/nullfs/null_vnops.c > index 5a6823f..38da43f 100644 > --- a/sys/fs/nullfs/null_vnops.c > +++ b/sys/fs/nullfs/null_vnops.c > _at__at_ -742,5 +742,6 _at__at_ struct vop_vector null_vnodeops = { > .vop_setattr = null_setattr, > .vop_strategy = VOP_EOPNOTSUPP, > .vop_unlock = null_unlock, > + .vop_vptocnp = vop_stdvptocnp, > .vop_vptofh = null_vptofh, > }; > Fixed panic.Received on Mon Mar 09 2009 - 22:08:01 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:43 UTC