On Thursday 12 March 2009 01:41 am, Robert Noland wrote: > On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 15:07 -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > > On Wednesday 11 March 2009 02:52 pm, Robert Noland wrote: > > > On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 12:33 -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > > > > With popular demands, I will commit the following patch in > > > > next few days unless a showstopper is found or > > > > "over-my-dead-body" type of review is received. ;-) > > > > > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/amd64_suspend-20090311.diff > > > > > > > > FYI, it was originally posted here: > > > > > > > > http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200810211228.31028.jkim > > > > > > > > and here: > > > > > > > > http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200812102120.03788.jkim > > > > > > > > Please read the original threads for more information about > > > > the patch. > > > > > > Does this address SMP as well? Or is that still hanging out in > > > the wind? > > > > Yes, it does. > > Cool, looking forward to it... Wait a minute. Are you talking about SMP i386? If so, the answer to that question is no although it will be relatively easy to do fix after the patch. This patch only address UP/SMP amd64. Jung-uk KimReceived on Thu Mar 12 2009 - 12:42:58 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:43 UTC