Re: libusb and fast current changes

Andrew Thompson wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 05:51:51PM +0300, Boris Samorodov wrote:
>> On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 14:39:11 +0000 Bruce Cran wrote:
>>> On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 17:29:21 +0300
>>> Boris Samorodov <bsam_at_ipt.ru> wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:39:15 +0000 Bruce Cran wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Lots of changes were made a couple of days ago to the
>>>>> installation of libusb[20]: libusb20 is now installed as libusb, and
>>>>> libusb20_compat01.h was renamed to usb.h to be compatible with
>>>>> libusb-0.1.  So for example any patches which change <usb.h> to
>>>>> <libusb20_compat01.h> can be removed.
>>>> Wow! Bruce, that was a nice shot. You definitely undertand what's
>>>> going on here. Thanks!
>>>>
>>>> Pav, can you test the attached patch? It work for the latest
>>>> i386/amd64 CURRENT for me.
>>> You may find you're repeating work that's already been done:
>>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/graphics/libgphoto2/ shows
>>> libgphoto2 was updated a few days ago to fix the build problems
>>> introduced with the renaming. 
>> It's the last version that doesn't work here. Please, take a look at
>> the patch at my previous email and you'll understand that I
>> implemented just what you said: "any patches which change <usb.h> to
>> <libusb20_compat01.h> can be removed". ;-)
>>
>> I think that an extra-patch for OSVERSION>800069 was introduced by an
>> accident.
> 
> Yes, it should be removed.

Removed, then.

Pav