Attilio Rao wrote: > 2009/3/13, John Baldwin <john_at_baldwin.cx>: >> This is similar to the patch I've asked lulf_at_ to test except that >> it is longer and I fix a bug where zfs_lookup() can leak a vnode >> lock if the access check fails. :-) The last one I sent to lulf_at_ >> is at www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/patches/zfs_ea.patch. > > I really thought zfs_lookup() was returning the lock held as a > feature assming no LOCKLEAF. Is that a bug instead? Yes, I think that is the real bug. Looking at this further I think zfs_get_xattrdir() will return the vnode locked if it has to create a new node via zfs_make_attrdir() but only returns it held and unlocked if it finds an existing one. So my new patch is to just fix zfs_get_xattrdir() to unlock the vnode if it creates a new one like so: (Sorry, TBird is probably going to butcher all the whitespace): --- //depot/user/jhb/lock/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/zfs_dir.c +++ /Users/jhb/work/p4/lock/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/zfs_dir.c _at__at_ -940,6 +940,7 _at__at_ /* NB: we already did dmu_tx_wait() if necessary */ goto top; } + VOP_UNLOCK(*xvpp, 0); return (error); } A non-butchered version is at www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/patches/zfs_ea.patch. -- John BaldwinReceived on Fri Mar 13 2009 - 16:28:51 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:43 UTC