2009/3/13, John Baldwin <jhb_at_freebsd.org>: > John Baldwin wrote: > > > Attilio Rao wrote: > > > > > 2009/3/13, John Baldwin <john_at_baldwin.cx>: > > > > > > > This is similar to the patch I've asked lulf_at_ to test except that it > is longer and I fix a bug where zfs_lookup() can leak a vnode lock if the > access check fails. :-) The last one I sent to lulf_at_ is at > www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/patches/zfs_ea.patch. > > > > > > > > > > I really thought zfs_lookup() was returning the lock held as a feature > assming no LOCKLEAF. Is that a bug instead? > > > > > > > Yes, I think that is the real bug. Looking at this further I think > > zfs_get_xattrdir() will return the vnode locked if it has to create a > > new node via zfs_make_attrdir() but only returns it held and unlocked if > > it finds an existing one. So my new patch is to just fix > > zfs_get_xattrdir() to unlock the vnode if it creates a new one like so: > > > > (Sorry, TBird is probably going to butcher all the whitespace): > > > > --- > > > //depot/user/jhb/lock/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/zfs_dir.c > > +++ > > > /Users/jhb/work/p4/lock/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/zfs_dir.c > > _at__at_ -940,6 +940,7 _at__at_ > > /* NB: we already did dmu_tx_wait() if necessary */ > > goto top; > > } > > + VOP_UNLOCK(*xvpp, 0); > > > > return (error); > > } > > > > A non-butchered version is at > www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/patches/zfs_ea.patch. > > > > So lulf_at_ reports success with this patch. Pawel, can you review it? Yeah, I proposed to lulf this same patch yesterday, I just didn't wait for him to complete the test because I had to sleep, so I think this is the right fix. Thanks, Attilio -- Peace can only be achieved by understanding - A. EinsteinReceived on Sat Mar 14 2009 - 00:47:57 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:44 UTC