I'm running into a similar problem here, on a Lenovo X200. I've been able to narrow it down to r190100, which removed uscanner(4) from the tree: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-head/2009-March/005098.html> I've verified this by checking out sources from a few hours ago, reverting r190100 (and, by extension, 190102), and I can now boot with the resulting kernel. I'm not exactly sure how it is this change is causing a panic, though. For reference, here's a snippet of a boot -v on a panicing kernel: ----- ULE: setup cpu 0 ULE: setup cpu 1 ACPI: <verbose ACPI stuff snipped> MADT: Found IO APIC ID 1, Interrupt 0 at 0xfec00000 ioapic0: Changing APIC ID to 1 ioapic0: Routing external 8259A's -> intpin0 MADT: Interrupt override: source 0, irq 2 ioapic0: Routing IRQ 0 -> intpin 2 MADT: Interrupt override: source 9, irq 9 ioapic0: intpin 9 trigger: level lapic0: Routing NMI -> LINT1 lapic0: LINT1 trigger: edge lapic0: LINT1 polarity: high lapic1: Routing NMI -> LINT1 lapic1: LINT1 trigger: edge lapic1: LINT1 polarity: high ioapic0 <Version 2.0> irqs 0-23 on motherboard cpu0 BSP: ID: 0x00000000 VER: 0x00050014 LDR: 0x00000000 DFR: 0xffffffff lint0: 0x00010700 lint1: 0x00000400 TPR: 0x00000000 SVR: 0x000001ff timer: 0x000100ef therm: 0x00010000 err: 0x00010000 pcm: 0x00000400 wlan: <802.11 Link Layer> kernel trap 12 with interrupts disabled Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode cpuid = 0; apic id = 00 fault virtual address = 0x3c fault code = supervisor write data, page not present instruction pointer = 0x8:0xffffffff8056d9df stack pointer = 0x10:0xffffffff80f82c70 frame pointer = 0x10:0xffffffff80f82ca0 code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b = DPL 0, pres 1, long 1, def32 0, gran 1 processor eflags = resume, IOPL = 0 current process = 0 (swapper) [thread pid 0 tid 100000 ] Stopped at devclass_find_internal+0x10f: orl $0x1,0x3c(%rax) db> bt Tracing pid 0 tid 100000 td 0xffffffff80bb6260 devclass_find_internal() at devclass_find_internal+0x10f driver_module_handler() at driver_module_handler+0xb9 module_register_init() at module_register_init+0x7d mi_startup() at mi_startup+0x59 btext() at btext+0x2c db> ----- Feels more like this change is triggering a problem elsewhere in the kernel. - DamianReceived on Thu Mar 26 2009 - 19:46:25 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:45 UTC