On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 14:56:54 +0200 Ivan Voras <ivoras_at_freebsd.org> wrote: > Gary Jennejohn wrote: > > On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 05:24:29 +0000 > > "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk_at_phk.freebsd.dk> wrote: > > > >> In message <DED07257-A1C7-4504-9A9E-CAAC2A9737D6_at_mac.com>, Marcel Moolenaar wri > >> tes: > >> > >>> I plan to remove the "old" partitioning GEOMs mentioned in the subject > >>> line some time this week. Let me know if any of these should remain for now > >>> due to issues with gpart. > >> Never mind gpart, but don't we have some guidelines for how long time > >> we leave stuff around before we rip it out ? > >> > > > > I have some disks which were partitioned before GEOM or gpart even > > existed. If this means that I can't use them any more I'll be very > > ticked off. > > No, the question is which GEOM class to use to parse the partition table :) > > gpart is new, shiny, but with some rough edges (most of which have been > polished by now), GEOM_xxx were the old classes. 8-CURRENT doesn't use > the old classes but they are still there if anyone needs them. > Well, that would be OK then, as long as I can still _use_ the old classes after the removal of the various GEOM_XXX options. --- Gary JennejohnReceived on Tue Mar 31 2009 - 11:55:48 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:45 UTC