David Wolfskill wrote: > On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 10:43:26PM +0100, Bruce Simpson wrote: > >> ... >> Can you try this patch? This patch is probably more correct -- but you >> can see my intent was to avoid thrashing the INP lock on mcast delivery. >> INP lock use in that routine is goopy to read. That'll teach me to do >> things from memory for IPv4... bah! :-) >> > > OK; that one works, too: > Thanks, I have checked it in. cheers BMSReceived on Fri May 01 2009 - 09:06:10 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:46 UTC