Re: [not completely SOLVED] acroread8 does not print any more

On 04.05.2009 22:12 (UTC+2), Boris Samorodov wrote:
> On Mon, 04 May 2009 22:05:45 +0200 Rainer Hurling wrote:
> 
>> John, thank you for answering.
> 
>> On 04.05.2009 16:55 (UTC+2), John Baldwin wrote:
>>> On Sunday 26 April 2009 1:56:01 pm Rainer Hurling wrote:
>>>> A few days ago I reported about problems when I try to print from
>>>> acroread8. For all but one of my systems the problem is solved now,
>>>> see below.
>>>>
>>>> On one system I also totally cleaned up the linux emulator part and
>>>> installed everything from the scratch. Now when I try to print I
>>>> get the following message:
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> Beim Drucken ist folgender Fehler aufgetreten...
>>>> '/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/lib/compat/libc.so.6: version
>>>> GLIBC_2.2.4 required by /usr/local/Adobe/Reader8/DEU/
>>>> Adobe/Reader8/Reader/intellinux/lib/libgcc_s.so.1 not
>>>> defined'
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> libc.so.6 is from misc/compat6x. I am not able to detect any
>>>> relevant differences between my systems.
>>> You need a Linux libc.so.6 in /compat/linux.  You need to install an
>>> RPM that contains this into /compat/linux (probably called something
>>> like 'compat-libc').  Probably it would be nice to have a port for
>>> this (or include it in the linux base port) for acroread8 to depend
>>> on.  I think this is a ports_at_ issue though.
>>>
> 
>> On /compat/linux/lib I have 'libc-2.7.so' and a link 'libc.so.6 -> 
>> libc-2.7.so'.
> 
>> #pkg_info -W /compat/linux/lib/libc-2.7.so
>> /compat/linux/lib/libc-2.7.so was installed by package linux_base-f8-8_11
> 
>> But there is another libc.so.6:
> 
>> #pkg_info -W /usr/local/lib/compat/libc.so.6
>> /usr/local/lib/compat/libc.so.6 was installed by package
>> compat6x-i386-6.4.604000.200810
> 
>> I have the CURRENT systems with, as far as I can see, exact the same
>> configuration. On all my other systems printing from acroread8 is
>> ok. Because of that I opened this thread :-(
> 
>> I have no idea where to look next,
> 
> Did you compare ktrace/linux_kdump at a system w/o problems and
> a system with this problem?

Yes, I reported about it on emulation_at_ on May 1st. It was very difficult 
because the are so many places acroread is looking for or working with 
'libc.so.6'.

I listed many messages before the error message appears. Please see on 
emulation_at_.

Rainer Hurling


> WBR