On Tue, 19 May 2009, Adrian Chadd wrote: > I don't think there's any support for Dom0 stuff in FreeBSD. > > http://wiki.freebsd.org/FreeBSD/Xen has further information about what > is and isn't supported at this time. > > Adrian > > 2009/5/19 Saifi Khan <saifi.khan_at_twincling.org>: > > On Mon, 18 May 2009, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > > >> I've started documenting (mostly for my own memory for now!) my > >> experiences getting a working FreeBSD-current Xen environment > >> together. > >> > >> http://wiki.freebsd.org/AdrianChadd/XenHackery > >> > >> Notable bits: pygrub works. :) > >> > >> Adrian > > > > Hi: > > > > What is the extent of Dom0 support for FreeBSD 8.x with Xen > > 3.3.x ? > > > > My interest is to run multiple guest OS hosted on a Xen-ified > > (aka paravirtualized) FreeBSD 8.x on a multi-core intel or AMD64 > > box. > > > > Any pointers or observations ? > > Hi Adrian: Thank you for the clarification about "no dom0 support in FreeBSD 8.x as of now". Yes, i did visit the wiki link couple of months ago and in fact dropped a mail to Kip as well :) there was no response, guess he was busy. i'd be thankful, if you could share your observations about the following: . is dom0 support something that FreeBSD will target at some point in time or would be happy to be domU ? . there was some mention of vimage/bitvisor in one of the slides (i think on scribd.com). So, is it that jails getting extended to support virtualization+containers and thus a entirely different approach which does not use Xen ? . is it envisaged that a stable NetBSD dom0 implementation would then be ported to FreeBSD (maybe) ? Thank you for your time. thanks Saifi.Received on Tue May 19 2009 - 02:24:16 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:47 UTC