> I thought I was referring to that too. :-) I guess I thought signaling the > pageout daemon to move vnodes from active to inactive was the way to do > that. Are you saying there is another caching layer of vnodes going on in > zfs? I'll look around for that this evening. I apologize. Again you are correct. However, I don't see that helping. The VM doesn't associate arc cache pages with ZFS vnodes. So I don't see that helping in this case. We need some way of coupling the two. The challenge with the ARC is that it caches logical disk blocks, not file pages. Cheers, KipReceived on Tue May 19 2009 - 17:43:29 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:48 UTC