> On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 01:12:38PM +0200, Roman Divacky wrote: > > On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 12:36:49PM +0200, Nick Barkas wrote: > > > Some time during the next week or so, I plan on committing the attached > > > patch. It adds a vm_lowmem event handler to the dirhash code in UFS2 so > > > that dirhashes will be deleted when the system is low on memory. This > > > allows one to increase the maximum amount of memory available for > > > dirhash on machines that have memory to spare (via the > > > vfs.ufs.dirhash_maxmem sysctl), and hopefully just improving behaviour > > > in low memory situations. I worked on this last year for the summer of > > > code with David Malone as my mentor. > > > > cool! do you have any performance numbers? graphs? :) what value do you recommend > > for the dirhash_maxmem sysctl? > > Oh yes, I have many graphs: http://wiki.freebsd.org/DirhashDynamicMemory > When I ran those tests a few months ago, I used 64MB for dirhash_maxmem > on a system with 1GB of memory. I have not tried other amounts of memory > besides that, at least that I can recall, so please let me know what you > find if you experiment with other values. Performance improvements and > sometimes degradations changed depending on the type of work load, and > the results on 7.x were also sometimes quite different from -current. > I feel that the tests I did were pretty artificial though, so it would > be great to hear about any results found with more realistic testing. I'm wondering if you have a low limit on how far you will reduce the dirhash. In a system that is thrashing a bit (due to a large process, for example), I can imagine multiple (10+) calls to the lowmem handler in rapid succession that would completely deplete the dirhash. Seems like this would result in even worse thrashing as more disk I/O occurs due to lack of dirhash. -DG David G. Lawrence President Download Technologies, Inc. - http://www.downloadtech.com - (866) 399 8500 Pave the road of life with opportunities.Received on Wed May 27 2009 - 09:45:54 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:48 UTC