On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 09:57:31AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: > I was initially impressed by the numbers until I saw the scales.. > a difference between 475.5 and 474 is not that significant, but if > your graph scale is from 473 to 477, it looks at first glace very > impressive. I think we felt the real gains here would be the ability to set the dirhash memory limits to a much larger value without having to worry about it chewing all your memory. The results basically confirm that we haven't introduced any serious regressions ;-) David.Received on Wed May 27 2009 - 17:07:42 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:48 UTC