Gavin Atkinson wrote: > On Tue, 3 Nov 2009, Tom Judge wrote: >> Tom Judge wrote: >>> Weldon S Godfrey 3 wrote: >>>> we are using onboard NICs on the Dell using the bce driver. We did >>>> try several times to see if using an intel PCIexpress card using the >>>> em driver, and we had the same symptoms. >>>> >>>> Could the bce driver have the same leak? >>> >>> The bce driver does not have a memory leak, it does however have a >>> bug which causes memory fragmentation leading to denied mbuf allocation. >>> >>> There is a work around for this in current, you can get the patch >>> like this: >>> >>> http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base/head/ >>> >> That should be: >> >> svn diff -r 198319:198320 http://svn.freebsd.org/base/head >> >>> You need to put >>> >>> options BCE_JUMBO_HDRSPLIT >>> >>> In your kernel to enable the work arround. > > Unless I'm missing something, these seem like they may be totally > different bugs. The symptoms that Weldon S Godfrey has show the number > of "mbuf clusters in use" rising to the point at which the limit is > reached, whereas the thread on -stable where BCE_JUMBO_HDRSPLIT is > recommended has the symptom of "requests for 9k jumbo clusters denied" > increasing and the mbuf clusters not being anywhere near to the maximum. > > So, I think there may be some confusion here. Jumbo frames are not in use what what I have read in the thread however there are denied requests for mbuf+clusters, so this could be the issue in the bce driver with standrad size frames. See: 0/201276/90662 requests for mbufs denied (mbufs/clusters/mbuf+clusters) I guess that there are 2 issues at work here, adding the bce patch should not cause any problems but may resolve the issue when using the bce driver. Is it not worth a try? TomReceived on Tue Nov 03 2009 - 21:29:05 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:57 UTC