On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Kostik Belousov <kostikbel_at_gmail.com> wrote: > > Aren't atomic_readandclear need the same workaround ? > I understood that the bug manifests itself only when lock instruction is used. atomic_readandclear doesn't use lock. I think i386/linux/linux_support.s and amd64/linux32/linux32_support.s need the work-around too. > It would be much easier to read the patch if you generated it > with analog of "svn diff -x -p" for your VCS. > I'm sorry, I'll do my best next time. -- Giovanni TrematerraReceived on Thu Nov 05 2009 - 11:24:56 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:57 UTC