On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 10:50:16 -0500 (EST) Rick Macklem <rmacklem_at_uoguelph.ca> wrote about Re: nfsv4 FreeBSD server vs. Linux client I/O error: RM> > P.S.: And one more question comes to my mind: How do I prevent a dir RM> > from being mountable with nfs3? With the extra exports line it will RM> > also be available as nfs3, won't it? RM> Yep, there is currently no way to say that an exported fs is for nfsv4 RM> only. There are sysctl's that can restrict what versions of nfs the RM> experimental server handles, but they apply to all mounts. RM> If a lot of people need this feature, I can look at adding it, but RM> my nfs todo list is getting pretty long and one of them is to look RM> at a possible mountd replacement. (This might be a part of that?) Not for me, I do not need the feature. I was only thinking about it because the better security of nfsv4 is easily gotten around when you allow for the old v3 mounts in parallel. RM> ps: I hope you didn't mind me adding freebsd-current_at_ as a cc, since RM> I figured others will need the info someday. Yes, of course. I also had the plan to cc: the list, but then forgot about it. Thanks for your support. cu GerritReceived on Mon Nov 16 2009 - 15:15:30 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:58 UTC