On 17 Nov 2009, at 00:29, Doug Barton wrote: > Rui Paulo wrote: >> On 16 Nov 2009, at 21:27, Doug Barton wrote: >> >>> Doug Barton wrote: >>>> Rui, it would be nice to include a note about this in UPDATING. >>> To be fair someone else drew my attention to the fact that there is an >>> entry in UPDATING about the change, however it doesn't mention >>> wpa_supplicant, and merely recompiling wpa_supplicant wasn't >>> sufficient to fix the problem, so perhaps that entry could be expanded. >> >> Well, when I did this change I did build with -DNOCLEAN and it rebuilt a good wpa_supplicant. > > I'm not in any way implying that you did not test the change thoroughly. > > Please let me know your intentions regarding the UPDATING entry. I'll > be glad to augment it myself if necessary. I'm ok with mentioning that wpa_supplicant must also be rebuilt and/or mentioning that NOCLEAN must be disabled. -- Rui PauloReceived on Tue Nov 17 2009 - 00:03:46 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:58 UTC