Re: request: LOADER_ZFS_SUPPORT

From: krad <kraduk_at_googlemail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 09:14:39 +0000
2009/11/17 Nikolay Denev <ndenev_at_gmail.com>

> On 17 Nov, 2009, at 09:31 , Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
>
> > On 17/11/09 6:21 PM, Nikolay Denev wrote:
> >> I've also thought about that, but I guess one of the issues is that this
> way
> >> FreeBSD will by default load CDDL-ed code, which may not be desirable.
> >> Probably a compromise would be to build two loaders by default, one with
> zfs support and the standard one.
> >
> >
> > I don't believe this is the issue since FreeBSD already comes with zfs.ko
> and opensolaris.ko already built by default. That is, it includes the CDDL
> code from ZFS itself. The boot loader is a FreeBSD invention (although
> probably built with pieces of code from the ZFS module).
> >
> > Ari Maniatis
> >
> > --
> > -------------------------->
> > ish
> > http://www.ish.com.au
> > Level 1, 30 Wilson Street Newtown 2042 Australia
> > phone +61 2 9550 5001   fax +61 2 9550 4001
> > GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
>
> They are built by default, but not loaded in memory by default. That's the
> difference.
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Nikolay Denev
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"
>

its the loader thats the issue Nikolay not the kernel modules
Received on Tue Nov 17 2009 - 08:14:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:58 UTC