2009/11/30 Eirik Øverby <ltning_at_anduin.net>: >> That URL works for me. So how much traffic is this box handling during >> peak times? > > Depends how you define load. It's a storage box (14TB ZFS) with a small handful of NFS clients pushing backup data to it .. So lots of traffic in bytes/sec, but not many clients. Ok. > If you're referring to the Send-Q and Recv-Q values, they are zero everywhere I can tell. Hm, I was. Ok. >> See if you have full socket buffers showing up in netstat -an. Have >> you tweaked the socket/TCP send/receive sizes? I typically lock mine >> down to something small (32k-64k for the most part) so I don't hit >> mbuf exhaustion on very busy proxies. > I haven't touched any defaults except the mbuf clusters. What does your sysctl.conf look like? I just set these: net.inet.tcp.sendspace=65536 net.inet.tcp.recvspace=65536 I tweak a lot of other TCP stack stuff to deal with satellite latencies; its not relevant here. I'd love to see where those mbufs are hiding and whether they're a leak, or whether the NFS server is just pushing too much data out for whatever reason. Actually, something I also set was this: # Handle slightly more packets per interrupt tick net.inet.ip.intr_queue_maxlen=512 It was defaulting to 50 which wasn't fast enough for small packet loads. AdrianReceived on Mon Nov 30 2009 - 07:50:06 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:58 UTC