on 30/09/2009 21:02 Justin Teller said the following: > We're trying to control one process from another process through > signals (I know, revolutionary ;-), and we've found that a signal > occasionally gets lost. The process we're signaling is > multi-threaded. It looks like the signal is lost when the kernel > decides to post the signal to a thread that is in the process of dying > (calling pthread_exit, etc). > > Is this expected behavior that we should just handle, or is it a race > in the kernel that should be/will be/already is fixed? > > It may be that a fix is already in current, and I just haven't found > it in my searches through the source code (I'm working off of source > code for an older 8.0 image). If it is fixed, I'd appreciate a > pointer to the code that fixes it. > > Thanks in advance for the help Do you allow all/arbitrary threads to catch signals? not sure if the following applies to your case, but for multi-threaded applications we usually designate a dedicated signal handling thread. sigwait(2), pthread_sigmask(2), etc -- Andriy GaponReceived on Thu Oct 01 2009 - 10:53:38 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:56 UTC