Re: urtw(4) feedback.

From: Ian FREISLICH <ianf_at_clue.co.za>
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2009 20:05:21 +0200
Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 October 2009 17:10:58 Ian FREISLICH wrote:
> > [mini] /usr/src/sys/modules/usb/urtw # time ping -c2 10.0.2.1
> > PING 10.0.2.1 (10.0.2.1): 56 data bytes
> > 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=36.176 ms
> > 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=44.282 ms
> >
> > --- 10.0.2.1 ping statistics ---
> > 2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
> > round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 36.176/40.229/44.282/4.053 ms
> >
> > real    0m1.696s
> > user    0m0.000s
> > sys     0m0.001s
> >
> > It also takes about 10 seconds for the wlan0 interface to appear
> > after insertion.
> 
> And if you use "ping -f" ?
> 
> Could it be that it is only the last packet sent that is not flushed out?

[mini] /usr/src # time ping -f -c2 10.0.2.1
PING 10.0.2.1 (10.0.2.1): 56 data bytes
.
--- 10.0.2.1 ping statistics ---
2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 9.752/9.934/10.115/0.182 ms

real    0m0.024s
user    0m0.008s
sys     0m0.001s

however, 200 results in packet loss:

[mini] /usr/src # time ping -f -c200 10.0.2.1
PING 10.0.2.1 (10.0.2.1): 56 data bytes
..............
--- 10.0.2.1 ping statistics ---
200 packets transmitted, 187 packets received, 6.5% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 3.782/10.161/15.065/2.029 ms

real    0m3.866s
user    0m0.000s
sys     0m0.034s

Ian

--
Ian Freislich
Received on Wed Oct 07 2009 - 16:05:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:56 UTC