Steve Kargl wrote: > On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 01:49:27PM +1100, Alex R wrote: > >> Steve Kargl wrote: >> >>> So, you have 4 cpus and 4 folding-at-home processes and you're >>> trying to use the system with other apps? Switch to 4BSD. >>> >>> >>> >> I thought SCHED_ULE was meant to be a much better choice under an SMP >> environment. Why are you suggesting he rebuild his kernel and use the >> legacy scheduler? >> >> > > If you have N cpus and N+1 numerical intensitive applications, > ULE may have poor performance compared to 4BSD. In OP's case, > he has 4 cpus and 4 numerical intensity (?) applications. He, > however, also is trying to use the system in some interactive > way. > > Ah ok. Is this just an accepted thing by the freebsd dev's or are they trying to fix it?Received on Mon Oct 12 2009 - 02:35:29 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:56 UTC