Re: IPv6 regression on 8.x

From: Hiroki Sato <hrs_at_FreeBSD.org>
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 15:59:58 +0900 (JST)
"Li, Qing" <qing.li_at_bluecoat.com> wrote
  in <B583FBF374231F4A89607B4D08578A43052EEDE6_at_bcs-mail03.internal.cacheflow.com>:

qi> Hi Hiroki,
qi>
qi> >
qi> >  2) Issue of subnet-router anycast address with a global address
qi> >
qi> >  Thanks for the fixes!  With the two patches 1) and 3) are gone, but
qi> >  2) still remains.  Is there something I can help to narrow down it?
qi> >
qi>
qi> Hmm... I tried multiple test cases and all seem to work as expected.
qi> I also tried the exact configuration sequence as you outlined in your
qi> original bug report email, and that case worked, too.
qi>
qi> The only difference I can see from the given information, is I have
qi> 3 em interfaces, whereas you have 2 em interfaces and 1 re, but I
qi> don't see how that would make a difference.

 I think reproduction of the case 2) needs two boxes.  One has two
 NICs and another has one NIC, and the three NICs are connected with a
 subnet independent from each other.

 Anyway, I will try the a-box-with-three-NICs case when I return home
 today.  I didn't try it.

qi> Would it be possible for you to email me your system configuration
qi> produced from "ifconfig" and "netstat" privately ?

 Sure.  I will send them to you later.

-- Hiroki

Received on Wed Sep 02 2009 - 05:00:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:54 UTC