RE: 8.0-BETA3/IPv6: route: bad keyword: cloning

	Regarding the man page issue, after a quick investigation, and
to 
	make a long story short, Kip Macy and I spent a bunch of time
testing 
	and fixing a few last minute bugs before my big commit last
December. 

	Kip actually took care of this man page and one other issue in
"ndp"
	command. 

	Somehow these two last minute changes fell through the cracks
	and did not make it into r186119. Kip will fix it again.

	Thank you for catching the bug.

	-- Qing

	

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-freebsd-stable_at_freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> stable_at_freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Li, Qing
> Sent: Friday, September 04, 2009 11:15 AM
> To: Jeff Blank; freebsd-stable_at_freebsd.org
> Cc: FreeBSD Current
> Subject: RE: 8.0-BETA3/IPv6: route: bad keyword: cloning
> 
> >
> > Upon booting an 8.0-BETA3 system with IPv6 enabled, I saw this in
the
> > console boot output:
> >
> > route: bad keyword: cloning
> > usage: route [-dnqtv] command [[modifiers] args]
> >
> > This looks like it's from line 1062/1063 of /etc/network.subr
> > v1.195.2.4.
> >
> > This system is not an IPv6 router, so do I particularly need
> > $ipv6_default_interface set in rc.conf?
> >
> > Is there a situation where -cloning (still referenced in the man
page)
> > is a valid option to route (in inet6 context at least)?  If no,
> should
> > I file a PR?  (I searched GNATS but didn't find anything matching
> > this.)
> >
> 
> 	Route cloning is obsolete. Please report issues concerning
> 	8.0 to freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org.
> 
> 	Thanks,
> 
> 	-- Qing
> 
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-stable_at_freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-
> unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"