On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 02:26:51PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > Juergen Lock wrote: > > Hi! > > > > I got a report of FreeBSD guest's new uart(4) driver misbehaving in > > qemu again(?) (output stopping for no apparent reason), and now found > > out the problem is tx irqs (UART_IIR_THRI) are getting lost because > > serial_update_irq() checks for the rx condtion, > > ... if ((s->ier & UART_IER_RDI) && (s->lsr & UART_LSR_DR)) > > first before checking for the tx irq condition, > > ... if ((s->ier & UART_IER_THRI) && s->thr_ipending) > > which at least in this case (FreeBSD 8 guest after doing > > set console="comconsole" > > at the loader prompt or when simply echo'ing text to /dev/ttyu0 > > or typing to the serial port from cu(1) on a `regular' vga console) > > causes the second condition (.. && s->thr_ipending) to be never > > reached anymore, or only after a very long delay. Moving that > > condition up so it is checked first like this, > > > > Index: qemu/hw/serial.c > > _at__at_ -189,7 +188,9 _at__at_ static void serial_update_irq(SerialStat > > { > > uint8_t tmp_iir = UART_IIR_NO_INT; > > > > - if ((s->ier & UART_IER_RLSI) && (s->lsr & UART_LSR_INT_ANY)) { > > + if ((s->ier & UART_IER_THRI) && s->thr_ipending) { > > + tmp_iir = UART_IIR_THRI; > > + } else if ((s->ier & UART_IER_RLSI) && (s->lsr & UART_LSR_INT_ANY)) { > > tmp_iir = UART_IIR_RLSI; > > } else if ((s->ier & UART_IER_RDI) && s->timeout_ipending) { > > /* Note that(s->ier & UART_IER_RDI) can mask this interrupt, > > _at__at_ -202,8 +203,6 _at__at_ static void serial_update_irq(SerialStat > > } else if (s->recv_fifo.count >= s->recv_fifo.itl) { > > tmp_iir = UART_IIR_RDI; > > } > > - } else if ((s->ier & UART_IER_THRI) && s->thr_ipending) { > > - tmp_iir = UART_IIR_THRI; > > } else if ((s->ier & UART_IER_MSI) && (s->msr & UART_MSR_ANY_DELTA)) { > > tmp_iir = UART_IIR_MSI; > > } > > > > ...fixes the issue for me, but I'm not 100% sure if this might cause > > rx irqs to come (too?) late when a guest keeps sending while its > > receiving at the same time. Anyone care to comment? :) > > The reordering violates the 16550A spec in that RX event overrules TX in > the IRQ status register. Maybe something else is wrong but it's not the > ordering in serial_update_irq. Well one problem seems to be the rx condition, ... if ((s->ier & UART_IER_RDI) && (s->lsr & UART_LSR_DR)) is not enough to trigger an irq, yet still causes the following conditions not to be checked anymore at all. And ideed, fixing that seems to get my FreeBSD 8 guest back to working order as well: Index: qemu/hw/serial.c _at__at_ -196,12 +195,10 _at__at_ static void serial_update_irq(SerialStat * this is not in the specification but is observed on existing * hardware. */ tmp_iir = UART_IIR_CTI; - } else if ((s->ier & UART_IER_RDI) && (s->lsr & UART_LSR_DR)) { - if (!(s->fcr & UART_FCR_FE)) { - tmp_iir = UART_IIR_RDI; - } else if (s->recv_fifo.count >= s->recv_fifo.itl) { - tmp_iir = UART_IIR_RDI; - } + } else if ((s->ier & UART_IER_RDI) && (s->lsr & UART_LSR_DR) && + (!(s->fcr & UART_FCR_FE) || + s->recv_fifo.count >= s->recv_fifo.itl)) { + tmp_iir = UART_IIR_RDI; } else if ((s->ier & UART_IER_THRI) && s->thr_ipending) { tmp_iir = UART_IIR_THRI; } else if ((s->ier & UART_IER_MSI) && (s->msr & UART_MSR_ANY_DELTA)) { Signed-off-by: Juergen Lock <nox_at_jelal.kn-bremen.de>Received on Sat Sep 12 2009 - 14:53:55 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:55 UTC