Kevin Oberman wrote: > No, you parsed it quite well, First time for everything. :) > but the standard recommendation was simply > to "re-install al ports" and was accompanied in some cases with the > suggestion to use portupgrade or portmaster to do this. I'm not sure that is the standard recommendation. However let me make myself clear, I and a lot of others recommend to first remove all your old ports, then reinstall the ones you want to have again. > Cleaning out /usr/local is the way to avoid this, but it is far more > time consuming, especially sysadmin time, than re-installing ports by > using portupgrade/portmaster, so it is done far less often. Actually I think time-wise it's a wash, unless you're in a position to do 'rm -rf /usr/local/*' in which case that would be much faster than 'pkg_delete -f *'. The reason it's a wash is that even portmaster and portupgrade do the pkg_delete step, they just do it "in line" with the upgrade for that port. hth, Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protectionReceived on Mon Sep 21 2009 - 20:29:59 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:55 UTC