On Thursday 24 September 2009 5:36:38 am Alexander Motin wrote: > Jaakko Heinonen wrote: > > On 2009-09-23, Alexander Motin wrote: > >> Then please explain me how it happens. I don't think that explanation > >> "it just works" sufficient. > >> > >> Any ideas what needed to reproduce that? Because it looks like not going > >> to fall in my case: > > > > It happens if a parent ata device is not attached. I can reproduce the > > problem on system which hash ata0, ata2 and ata3 devices but ata1 fails > > to probe. > > Nice catch. I think it is newbus problem, not ata. I am able to simulate > this problem locally and attached patch fixes it. Any objections? I think this is ok. Possibly ask Warner (imp_at_) as well to make sure. -- John BaldwinReceived on Thu Sep 24 2009 - 12:24:33 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:56 UTC