Re: Re: Intel H55 and em0

From: Jack Vogel <jfvogel_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 09:38:27 -0700
Yup, gonna MFC the code from CURRENT to STABLE/8 first thing next week, at
least that's my plan.

Sorry, I thought STABLE/8 already had PCH in it, my bad. I checked and the
ALTQ fix is in the tree, so pulling the directory from HEAD and adding it to
STABLE/8 should work fine.

MFC will be coming first thing Monday.

Jack


On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Jan Henrik Sylvester <me_at_janh.de> wrote:

> On 01/-10/-28163 20:59, Jack Vogel wrote:
>
>> OH, as to my last statement, the code in CURRENT will NOT work on 8.0
>> RELEASE,
>> it would require a change to sys/conf/files, and it also has a fix in the
>> stack that is not
>> in RELEASE. SO taking the latest would require you take the whole tree.
>>
>> Jack
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 11:39 PM, Jack Vogel<jfvogel_at_gmail.com>  wrote:
>>
>>  The device subfamily on those motherboards is called PCH, and its only in
>>> the em driver as of
>>> last December, The CVS delta of if_em is 1.27. You can either update to
>>> STABLE/8 or CURRENT.
>>> If you wish to just pull the e1000 driver directory it should work fine
>>> in
>>> 8.0 RELEASE also.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Jack
>>>
>>
> In your correction, you did not really mention 8-STABLE, you only warn
> about putting e1000 from CURRENT to 8.0-RELEASE.
>
> I got the same problem:
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-mobile/2010-March/011952.html
>
> Since I did not get a reply, I put the whole e1000 directory from CURRENT
> into 8-STABLE.
>
> Is there any problem with that? (It _seems_ to work so far.)
>
> Are you going to MFC the PCH devices to 8-STABLE any time soon?
>
> Thanks,
> Jan Henrik
>
Received on Thu Apr 01 2010 - 14:38:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:02 UTC