On Apr 2, 2010, at 3:55 PM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > Hi Marcel > > I got this panic while trying to build some port > on -current (csup'ed on 1-APR-2010) > > panic: deadlkres: possible deadlock detected for 0xe00000001187d880, blocked for 1801437 ticks > > cpuid = 1 > KDB: enter: panic > [ thread pid 0 tid 100046 ] > Stopped at kdb_enter+0x92: [I2] addl r14=0xffffffffffe1fbf0,gp ;; > db> > db> bt > Tracing pid 0 tid 100046 td 0xe000000010d4f500 > kdb_enter(0xe000000004853640, 0xe000000004853640, 0xe00000000439d170, 0x793) at kdb_enter+0x92 > panic(0xe00000000484b490, 0xe00000000484b6d0, 0xe00000001187d880, 0x1b7cdd) at panic+0x2f0 > deadlkres(0xa00000007ebca2d8, 0xe00000001187d880, 0xe00000000484b410, 0x1b7cdd) at deadlkres+0x470 > fork_exit(0xe000000004893250, 0x0, 0xa0000000bd3db550) at fork_exit+0x110 > enter_userland() at enter_userland > db> > > The panic followed a long freeze, of a sort that > I've seen a lot on ia64 in the last couple of weeks. > Do I get the panic (as opposed to a seemingly endless freeze) > because of a recently added > > options DEADLKRES > > in my kernel config? Yes, exactly. At the db> prompt, can you type: db> show thread 0xe00000001187d880 This should give you something like: Thread 100001 at 0xe00000001187d880: proc (pid 1): 0xe00000301220c000 name: kernel stack: 0xa00000021afd2000-0xa00000021afd9fff flags: 0x10005 pflags: 0 state: RUNNING (CPU 0) priority: 52 container lock: sched lock 0 (0xe000003400ad5080) With the thread ID, 100001 in the example above, type: db> thread 100001 This should give you something like: [ thread pid 1 tid 100001 ] kdb_enter+0x92: [I2] addl r14=0xffffffffffe279b8,gp ;; Then type the following for a backtrace: db> bt FYI, -- Marcel Moolenaar xcllnt_at_mac.comReceived on Fri Apr 02 2010 - 21:10:58 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:02 UTC