On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 2:12 AM, Erwin Lansing <erwin_at_freebsd.org> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 02:02:46AM -0700, Xin LI wrote: >> On 2010/04/05 01:50, Erwin Lansing wrote: >> > On Sun, Apr 04, 2010 at 03:06:15PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I realize that this is most suitable for current_at_ and I'm >> >> cross-posting, but I wanted to jot down all of the ports broken since >> >> the zlib version bump so that we can keep track of what's going on and >> >> what needs to be fixed. >> > >> > I have just started a new package build against todays HEAD on pointyhat >> > , actually before seeing this thread, so these, and any others, will be >> > picked up there. I'll update the list with the results when it finishes >> > in a day or two. >> >> Which svn revision is currently using on the build cluster? >> > Unfortunately, we're still using cvs for updating, but I just double > checked that it is past r206058. The update is less than an hour old > from cvs. You won't see the issue unless you roll back to before r206057; r206057 and r206058 disguise the compatibility issue by completely zapping the #ifdef _LARGEFILE64_SOURCE and #if _FILE_OFFSET_BITS == 64 enable pieces. Thanks, -GarrettReceived on Mon Apr 05 2010 - 07:30:13 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:02 UTC