On 04/08/2010 16:30, Marian Hettwer wrote: > On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 10:53:48 +0000, Kris Moore<kris_at_pcbsd.org> wrote: > > It's not nice to hijack a topic, but this is way to interesting for me, so > I do it anway :) > :) I didn't mean to hijack either, was trying to discuss advantage of having backend as a executable vs a library which can't be used standalone without front-end. This would in effect lock you completely into front-end logic, which may not meet a users specific needs, even though backend can do what user wants. >> This has a few advantages, in that the backend can be used stand-alone >> for scripted installations and also provide great flexibility >> to the front-end developer. They don't need to worry about performing >> any of the actual installation logic, they just provide a way >> for users to select their installation options, generate a configuration >> > >> script, and let the backend run with it. >> > scripted installation! > Are you able to do a pxeboot, nfsroot and then scripted installation? > Are those scripts portable to FreeBSD or PC-BSD only? > Could you give me a hint where to find them? > > TIA, > Marian > Correct, every install it does is a fully-scripted installation, and it can be used with pxeboot, or in a custom mfsroot image easily. Supports ZFS, glabel, gmirror, geli, GPT, gpart, vanilla FreeBSD installs, etc. http://trac.pcbsd.org/browser/pcbsd/trunk/pc-sysinstall Checkout examples/README for all the gory details of config-file generation. One caveat, the version in trunk is being very actively worked on by myself at the moment to prepare for 8.1, needs more docs, etc ;) -- Kris Moore PC-BSD Software iXsystemsReceived on Thu Apr 08 2010 - 14:49:09 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:02 UTC