On Sat, 2010-04-10 at 15:18 +0100, Bruce Simpson wrote: > On 04/10/10 02:31, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > > Alfred Perlstein , Matt at ix systems Kris (Mr PBI), some > > others and I, felt that these ideas seemed to make some sense > > and so I put them here for comment. > > Please do. Someone has to do something about deployment. > > For what it's worth, I've tripped over the garden rake on the ground, > that is 'unsatisfied dependency' one too many times in commercial work. > > If PBIs can address this, even for FreeBSD's embedded and server use > cases, they will likely be well recieved. If I understood the PBI construct correctly... How is this really that different than just producing static binaries? I mean, as I understood it, your bundling the binary and all of it's required libraries into a private directory tree and then playing linker games. robert. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org" -- Robert Noland <rnoland_at_FreeBSD.org> FreeBSDReceived on Sun Apr 11 2010 - 02:59:42 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:02 UTC