On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 01:23:42PM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Quoting Navdeep Parhar <nparhar_at_gmail.com> (from Wed, 14 Apr 2010 > 02:31:30 -0700): > > >On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 1:58 AM, Alexander Leidinger > ><netchild_at_freebsd.org> wrote: > >>Quoting Navdeep Parhar <nparhar_at_gmail.com> (from Wed, 14 Apr 2010 01:33:29 > >>-0700): > >> > >>>I read the UPDATING entry that accompanied r206082 and added WITH_CTF=yes > >>>to > >>>my kernel config, hoping to get CTF information in the kernel and all > >>>modules. No luck. > >>>It appears that NO_CTF remains set to 1 inspite of the undef NO_CTF in > >>>various .mk files > >>>and ctfconvert never runs. > >> > >>This is the output I get in my kernel build directory: > >>---snip--- > >># make -V NO_CTF -V WITH_CTF > >> > >>yes > > > >Can you also try a "makeoptions WITH_CTF=yes" in your KERNCONF > > The above one is with WITH_CTF in my kernel config, but this was > generated manually with cd /sys/i386/conf; config CONF; cd > ../compile/CONF; make -V... > > >and see if the results are as expected? How was r206082 tested? I'm > >trying to figure out the differences, if any, between your build setup and > >mine. > > I made a buildworld with and without WITH_CTF in src.conf to confirm > that it works (no installkernel, as the world is known to be not > useable with CTF), and I did a lot of tests by hand as above > (config;make). Have you or anyone else ever used buildkernel successfully with "makeoptions WITH_CTF=yes" in the conf file? Something as simple as this does not work for me: - pristine sources in /usr/src, empty /usr/obj, no /etc/make.conf, no /etc/src.conf - add "makeoptions WITH_CTF=yes" in sys/amd64/conf/GENERIC - make buildkernel in /usr/src The result is a kernel without CTF information. The log is at http://www.freebsd.org/~np/WITH_CTF.log Regards, NavdeepReceived on Wed Apr 14 2010 - 16:35:51 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:02 UTC