Freddie Cash ha scritto: >> So what is the public opinion: Is the lack of ataraid(4) fatal or we can >> live without it? Lack of ataraid means no more arX devices, right? I'd say it's not fatal for HEAD, but it is for a -STABLE branch. > ataraid(4) has served it's > purpose, tiding us over until GEOM RAID facilities were in place. Now it's > time for it to be retired. It doesn't seem to me that sysinstall supports gmirror or gstripe, so even if they could be better, currently I think many users still use ataraid for simple installations with mirrored disks. -- Alex DupreReceived on Thu Apr 22 2010 - 13:54:17 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:03 UTC